The Great Debate: Clashing Over Fictional MBTI Types

Typing fictional characters with the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is one of the most popular—and contentious—hobbies in the personality community. It's a fantastic way to breathe life into the 16 types, but it sparks lively debates. While some characters showcase clear preferences, others are complex, leaving room for interpretation.

These debates are so passionate because characters are often written inconsistently, or they grow and change. An author isn't usually thinking of cognitive functions, so a character might show traits of two different types. Let's explore some of the most iconic clashes. For a deeper look at the types, check out the MBTI Guide book.

Sherlock Holmes (INTJ vs. ISTJ)

This is the classic Intuition vs. Sensing debate.

• The INTJ Argument: Sherlock's brilliance isn't just observation; it's deduction. He uses Introverted Intuition (Ni) to see a "big picture" pattern that no one else does, presented in his "mind palace." He dismisses social norms (a weakness for INTJs) and prizes his own innovative, strategic thinking above all.
• The ISTJ Argument: Sherlock's "deductions" are actually based on a massive, internal database of past facts (Introverted Sensing - Si). He knows 243 types of tobacco ash. He relies on concrete, detailed observations from past experience to solve crimes. This meticulous, fact-based approach is the hallmark of an ISTJ.

Daenerys Targaryen (INFJ vs. ENFJ)

A debate between two very similar, vision-driven types.

• The INFJ Argument: Daenerys is driven by a singular, deep-seated vision (Introverted Intuition - Ni) to "break the wheel." Her empathy (Extraverted Feeling - Fe) is powerful, but it primarily serves her long-term vision. She forms a few deep, private bonds (e.g., with Missandei, Jorah) rather than drawing energy from the crowd.
• The ENFJ Argument: Daenerys is a public figure whose primary skill is inspiring masses. Her dominant function is Extraverted Feeling (Fe)—she is a charismatic "Breaker of Chains" who unites entire armies to her cause. Her vision (auxiliary Ni) is the tool she uses to fuel her public, people-focused mission.

Captain America (ISTJ vs. ISFJ)

This is a classic Thinking vs. Feeling debate, complicated by a strong sense of duty.

• The ISTJ View: Captain America has an unwavering moral compass, a deep respect for rules, and a strong sense of duty. This all points to a "Guardian" type. The ISTJ argument is that he is the "Soldier," driven by logic, tradition, and "the mission" (Introverted Sensing + Extraverted Thinking).
*
• The ISFJ Argument: Captain America's fierce loyalty is not to "the rules" but to his friends (like Bucky). His decisions are consistently driven by a desire to protect the innocent (Extraverted Feeling - Fe). In Civil War, he breaks all the rules (defying the Sokovia Accords) specifically to protect people, a strong argument for a Feeling type.

Batman (INTJ vs. ISTP)

A fascinating debate between a master planner and a master tactician.

• The INTJ Argument: Bruce Wayne is the ultimate master planner. His entire "Batman" persona is a long-term, complex strategy (Ni) to save his city. He builds efficient systems, prepares for every contingency, and works tirelessly to achieve his singular vision (Extraverted Thinking - Te).
• The ISTP Argument: Batman is the ultimate hands-on tinkerer and tactician. He is a master of gadgets (Introverted Thinking - Ti) and his physical environment (Extraverted Sensing - Se). He is an adaptable fighter who thinks and reacts in the moment, operating on his own internal logic, not a grand, abstract vision.

The Beauty of the Debate

These debates highlight the nuances of MBTI and the complexity of fictional characters. There's often no single "correct" answer, as a character's traits may be split. But the discussions themselves are the perfect way to understand the real difference between functions, like the future-focus of Ni versus the past-focus of Si.

Tips for a Productive MBTI Debate

• Focus on the character's behaviors and motivations, not just their actions.
• Provide specific evidence from the text or film to support your arguments.
• Be respectful of other interpretations—many types can look similar on the surface.
• Embrace the opportunity to learn new perspectives on the 16 types.

Remember, MBTI is a tool for exploration, not a definitive answer. So, the next time you encounter a character typing debate, join the discussion, and enjoy the journey of unraveling fictional personalities! For more on leveraging these insights, explore The MBTI Advantage book series.

What's your biggest fictional character debate? Share it in the comments!